Which of the following is an example of a hearsay exception?

Prepare for the Fairfax County Criminal Justice Academy Test with flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Each question includes hints and explanations to help you succeed. Get exam-ready!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is an example of a hearsay exception?

Hearsay comes from a statement made outside of court that’s offered to prove the truth of what it asserts. Most hearsay is not allowed, but some statements are allowed because they’re considered reliable enough despite being made outside the courtroom. An excited utterance fits this idea because it’s a spontaneous remark made while the declarant is still under the stress of a startling event. The lack of time for reflection makes deception or fabrication less likely, so the statement is trusted to reflect what actually happened, and it can be admitted for the truth of the matter asserted. For example, if someone blurts out “He ran that red light!” immediately after witnessing a crash, that sudden remark is treated as reliable enough to be admitted as evidence of what happened. In contrast, the best evidence rule is about presenting original documents when a writing is involved, not about admitting statements as truth; independent evidence rule isn’t a standard hearsay exception, and hearsay within hearsay isn’t an exception on its own but a scenario where each layer needs its own admissible basis.

Hearsay comes from a statement made outside of court that’s offered to prove the truth of what it asserts. Most hearsay is not allowed, but some statements are allowed because they’re considered reliable enough despite being made outside the courtroom. An excited utterance fits this idea because it’s a spontaneous remark made while the declarant is still under the stress of a startling event. The lack of time for reflection makes deception or fabrication less likely, so the statement is trusted to reflect what actually happened, and it can be admitted for the truth of the matter asserted.

For example, if someone blurts out “He ran that red light!” immediately after witnessing a crash, that sudden remark is treated as reliable enough to be admitted as evidence of what happened. In contrast, the best evidence rule is about presenting original documents when a writing is involved, not about admitting statements as truth; independent evidence rule isn’t a standard hearsay exception, and hearsay within hearsay isn’t an exception on its own but a scenario where each layer needs its own admissible basis.

More practice questions